Sullivan church of Christ – Sullivan, MO
Date: November 4, 2007
REPLY TO A METHODIST PASTOR
Jess Whitlock
EDITOR'S NOTE: The following is a letter to the editor replying to an article
that appeared in The Oklahoman, Aug. 11, 2007. In that article, a Methodist
pastor, Andrew Tevington, answers a question and makes a number of
incorrect assertions about churches of Christ. — Jess Whitlock
Having been a minister for the "churches of Christ" (Romans 16:16) for almost 40
years, I was intrigued by the article, "Church of Christ Guided By New
Testament," written by Mr. Andrew Tevington. But it occurred to me that it was a
colossal blunder on your part to have a Methodist minister explain what he
thought he knew about the church of Christ.
Mr. Tevington thought the church of Christ had its origin in America in the 18th
or 19th centuries. I guess he never thought to check his sources. Churches of
Christ were in England in the 1600s and in Germany in the 11th century, and
they existed in the first century (Romans 16:16).
Christ's church had a glorious beginning on the day of Pentecost in the city of
Jerusalem in approximately 33 A.D. (Acts 1:4-2:27). The gospel was preached
with power on that day and 3,000 souls obeyed the gospel by being baptized for
the remission of their sins (Acts 2:38) and were added to the church of Christ by
the Lord (Acts 2:41, 47). It is surprising that a man who refers to himself as a
"pastor" in the United Methodist Church is not familiar with the Scriptures in
these matters.
He is correct in stating that Barton W. Stone, Alexander Campbell and a host of
others withdrew from denominationalism, obeying the gospel and becoming
simply Christians. They threw away all man-made creeds and sought to follow
only the teaching of the New Testament. Isn't that what God asks of all men in
every age and in every place?
God's word comes through His Son Jesus Christ (Acts 10:36). His word is
inspired and furnishes us completely to every good work (2 Tim. 3:16-17). Jesus
said, "Thy word is truth..." (John 17:17) and that truth will set men free (John 8:
32). That word is styled, "the sword of the Spirit" (Ephesians 6:17), every word of
God is pure (Psalms 119:140; Proverbs 30:5-6), and by that word every person
living today will be judged (John 12:48) — not by a Book of Discipline or some
other man-made creed.
Mr. Tevington also correctly points out that those men and women who sought to
follow only the Bible were believers in Jesus Christ (John 8:24) and were in
congregations called "churches of Christ" (Romans 16:16). In the light of the
Scriptures, no one could possibly object to that practice. To do so would require
one to be more wedded to an uninspired man like James O'Kelly, John or
Charles Wesley, or Martin Luther, rather than to Jesus Christ.
Mr. Tevington correctly observes that churches of Christ — which still follow the
inspired word of God — oppose missionary societies and other organizations that
seek to replace the authority and autonomy of the local congregation. He also
points out that divisions have occurred among churches of Christ, resulting in
more man-made denominations such as The Disciples of Christ and the
Independent Christian Church denominations. The apostles said, "We ought to
obey God rather than men" (Acts 5:29). Disobedience to God generally results in
division and those who stand solidly for truth must never compromise with error
or false teachers and their ways. God's word must always be the last word
(Matthew 28:18; Hebrews 1:1-2; John 17:17; Colossians 3:17; Ephesians 3:3-4; 2
Thessalonians 2:15; Jude 3; Galatians 1:8-9; John 12:48).
Mr. Tevington expressed surprise at the unity of faith and practice among
churches of Christ when he wrote, "...each church of Christ decides for itself
what it believes and teaches. Despite this autonomy, there is a surprising
degree of similarity among churches in practice and doctrine." First Corinthians 1:
10 explains that "mystery" at which he expressed surprise. "Now I beseech you,
brethren, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that ye all speak the same
thing, and that there be no divisions among you; but that ye be perfectly joined
together in the same mind and in the same judgment."
It's simple. When everyone is following the same Bible authority and not
subscribing to a man-made creed, catechism, or oracle, it is easy to be "in the
same mind and in the same judgment." There is no "mystery" here. It is simple
obedience to God's will expressed in the New Testament.
Mr. Tevington correctly represents faithful churches of Christ when he writes
that the church of Christ, "typically prohibits the use of musical instruments in
worship." A question about instrumental music is what prompted the question
he answered in the article. He is correct saying that faithful churches of Christ,
"allow in church (sic) only those things that the New Testament specifically
authorizes." In this, he hit the proverbial nail right on its head. There is no
authority for mechanical instruments of music to be used in worship to God. He
thinks that authority is found only in Ephesians 5:19, but look at every other
passage in the New Testament where music is mentioned and one will not find
mechanical instruments in any of them. Here they are: Matthew 26:30; Acts 16:
25; Romans 15:9; First Corinthians 14:15; Colossians 3:16; Hebrews 2:12; James
5:13. Also consider Hebrews 13:15. Now, let us list every passage in the New
Testament where mechanical instruments are used in worship to God:
___________________. None exists.
Tevington says instruments of music were not used, "in Christian churches until
the 600s." Have you ever wondered why they were not used until six centuries
after the establishment of the church? Actually, they were not popular in worship
until after the 1200s. Justin Martyr wrote in 139 A.D., "The use of singing with
instrumental music was not received in the Christian churches, as it was among
the Jews in their infant state, but only the use of plain song."
The Schaff-Herzog Encyclopedia says, "In the Greek church the organ never came
into use. But after the eighth century, it became more and more common in the
Latin Church; not, however, without opposition from the side of the monks." In
the 16th century, the eminent Roman Catholic scholar and theologian, Erasmus,
wrote, "We have brought into our churches a certain operose and theatrical
music... The church rings with the noise of trumpets, pipes and dulcimers; and
human voices strive to bear their part with them. Men run to church as to a
theatre, to have their ears tickled." And John Wesley, founder of Mr. Tevington's
Methodism, was quoted by Adam Clarke as saying, "I have no opposition to the
organ in our chapel, provided it is neither seen nor heard" (Clarke's Commentary,
Vol. 4, p. 684).
It is correctly pointed out that members of the church of Christ baptize persons
"for the remission of sins" (Acts 2:38) when they seek such baptism of their own
free will. We do not pour or sprinkle water on a baby against his will because
that would avail nothing. To be saved, one must be baptized, but first one must
hear and believe God's word (Romans 10:17; John 8:24; Hebrews 11:6). A baby
can neither understand God's word nor believe it. Then one must repent of his
sins (Acts 2:38; Luke 13:3-5; Acts 17:30). A baby is innocent and has no sins of
which to repent. One must then confess the name of Christ (Matthew 10:32-33;
Acts 8:37). Babies cannot make such a confession.
I chuckled a bit at Mr. Tevington's statement that churches of Christ, "do,
however, celebrate Holy Communion (sic) every week, using grape juice instead
of wine." Why would he think we had any desire to imbibe wine is beyond me.
Surely, at some point in his studies, he must have come across the phrase,
"fruit of the vine," in Matthew 26:29, Mark 14:25, and Luke 22:18. They all say,
"fruit of the vine." Where does he — or anyone else — think we can find Biblical
authority for substituting alcoholic wine for the "fruit of the vine" — grape juice?
The Bible clearly condemns imbibing strong drink of any kind in the pages of both
the Old and New Testaments.
Another amusing statement is found in the final line of his article. He says,
"Therefore, the congregations are led by male elders." As they say in the common
vernacular, "Duh!" First Timothy 3:2 declares that, "A bishop then must be
blameless, the husband of one wife" (emph. JW). It appears that the elder
(bishop) would have to be a male. How else could this qualification be met?
Titus 1:6 is also plain in this regard: "If any be blameless, the husband of one
wife..." (emph. JW). The Holy Spirit did not want anyone to misunderstand this
qualification. In the Greek, this is a "one-wife man and not a one-wife woman!
One would need two PhDs to misunderstand this qualification for an elder!
Finally, I set forth the following propositions to Mr. Tevington for public
discussion:
1.) "The Methodist Church is scriptural, according to Christ's New Testament." I
will deny. Will Mr. Tevington affirm?
2.) "The church of Christ is scriptural, according to Christ's New Testament." I
will affirm. Will Mr. Tevington deny?
3.) "Singing is authorized in worship to God in Christ's New Testament." I will
affirm. Will Mr. Tevington deny?
4.) "Mechanical instruments of music are authorized in worship to God in
Christ's New Testament." I will deny. Will Mr. Tevington affirm?
— via Gospel Preceptor, www.gospelpreceptor.com